Years of scapegoating refugees haunts Harper Conservatives

Syrian refugees entering Turkey, UNHCR/I.Prickett
Syrian refugees entering Turkey, UNHCR/I.Prickett

Stephen Harper and the Conservatives have spent years scapegoating refugees and it is coming back to haunt them in the 2015 election campaign. The Conservatives’ messaging has been derailed by the sight of hundreds of thousands of refugees streaming into Europe, and by the images of the lifeless body of three-year-old Alan Kurdi being carried from a beach in Turkey. There is a widespread call within Canada for action.

4 million Syrian refugees

The United Nations High Commission for Refugees (UNHCR) says that there are more than four million Syrians refugees, people driven out of their country by a brutal civil war. As of this summer, nearly half of Syria’s 22.5 million people have been displaced, either within their country or outside of it. While attention recently has been riveted upon desperate people trying to get into Europe, there are far greater numbers of Syrian and Iraqi refugees in neighbouring countries. There are 1.9 million Syrians in Turkey, 1.1 million in Lebanon (where they are now one of every five people), 630,000 in Jordan, and 130,000 in Egypt.

Revamping policy

During the years when the Syrian conflict was building, the Conservative government was busily revamping its immigration and refugee policies. Harper put Jason Kenny, one of his most trusted ministers, in charge of making massive changes which began in 2012. The government attempts to attracting immigrants to Canada, particularly those with skills and money but has attempted to discourage and denigrate asylum seekers – and it has worked. Canada took in 35,000 refugees in 2005, just before the Conservatives came to power. By 2014, the number was 23,000, a reduction of nearly one-third.

Kenny and other Conservatives made no secret of their belief that many refugee claims were bogus and that many asylum seekers were opportunists.

Health care cuts

The government also moved in 2012 to deny refugees access to health care by making drastic cuts to the Interim Federal Health Program, which had been in place since 1957.

A number of Conservative MPs used their householders, paid for and distributed on their House of Commons budget, to stoke the fires of prejudice. The mail outs posed questions such as the following and asked constituents to respond by return mail: “Should refugees get gold-plated dental, vision and drug benefits?”, and “What level of health-care benefits do you believe the government should provide to failed and fraudulent refugee claimants?”

In truth, refugees had been receiving the same level of health care as people on social assistance. Some of the cuts were partially and temporarily restored in November 2014, after the Federal Court ruled that the policy changes constituted “cruel and unusual” treatment and were unconstitutional. The government has appealed that decision to the Supreme Court of Canada.

Stay the course

During the 2015 campaign, Harper has, so far, stubbornly insisted that he will stay the course – no added numbers of refugees beyond previous modest promises and no fundamental changes to practices that would expedite the process of getting people to safety in Canada.

Speaking at a campaign event on September 3, Harper said: “Our country has the most generous immigration and refugee system in the world. We admit per capita more people than any other.” Note that the prime minister speaks here of both immigrants and refugees. While Canada continues to court a certain demographic among immigrants, it has deliberately reduced the number of refugees it accepts.

Poor record

Using UNHCR numbers the National Post, normally considered friendly to the Conservatives, reports that when all classes of refugees are considered Canada ranks 41st globally in terms of its intake per capita, lower than poor countries such as Turkey and Jordan. When gross domestic product and geographic size are ranked, Canada places 55th and 93rd, respectively. It’s worth remembering that Canada, with a much smaller population than today, accepted 37,000 Hungarian refugees in 1956 and 110,000 Vietnamese boat people in the 1970s and 1980s.

The prime minister says that his critics want Canada to accept as refugees people whose claims have not been processed and that this would allow terrorists from ISIS to pose as refugees and come to Canada. Similar worries were expressed privately within government about potential communist infiltration when Canada accepted Hungarians and Vietnamese but those fears turned out to be baseless. In any event, no one is suggesting that refugees should not be processed but rather that many more refugees in Jordan, Lebanon and elsewhere could be interviewed and selected if Canada were to put in place the resources to do it.

Finally, the prime minister also insists upon the importance of Canada’s bombing missions, with allied countries, against the ISIS group in Iraq and Syria. That mission, he says, is necessary to protect Canadians against ISIS. We can debate the wisdom of a bombing campaign but there is no need for the existence of that campaign to reduce the urgency of accepting more refugees now.

Called to compassion

Harper is being chided by people from all quarters for his refusal to show more compassion and to take action. No one expects that Canada alone can solve the refugee crisis in Syria or elsewhere, but people from archbishops and imams, to premiers, to Rick Hillier, the former chief of defence staff, are calling for Canada to do more than it has.  Many Canadians have experience in welcoming and resettling refugees and they want to continue to make that contribution. If Harper does not accede in some way to this ardent desire, he may well pay the political price.

I enjoy receiving your comments. Simply click on Comments located below the social media icons and leave your message.  

Published by

Dennis

Dennis Gruending is an Ottawa-based writer, blogger and a former member of Parliament

7 thoughts on “Years of scapegoating refugees haunts Harper Conservatives”

  1. Agreed Dennis. Thanks for pointing out the distinction between “refugee” and “immigrant”. I will listen more closer to Harper’s words. If Damascus falls to ISIS and Al-Nusra, we have only seen the tip of the iceberg in terms of the number of refugees who will flee.

  2. Further, the CIC under the current government has not spent $350 million granted to it to process and settle refugees – so even under the flawed system we have, refugees are left waiting and suffering!

    Faith-based organizations have long-argued for change, as can be seen in the survey Citizens for Public Justice carried out last year http://www.cpj.ca/private-sponsorship-and-public-policy

    Thanks for keeping this issue alive, Dennis!

    1. That the plight of refugees is not the major driving force for Conservatives is seen that they are only now scrambling to put together a ‘refugee policy’, now that there’s an election coming. Where were they earlier? So their interest is entirely political, not principled humanitarianism.

  3. Thanks for the article. Harper deserves to be denounced. Pope Francis has called upon Catholic dioceses and parishes to adopt Syrian refugees, but so far the reaction of Canadian churchmen has been slow.

  4. I well recall the agreement made in 1979 by the Joe Clark government that allowed sponsorships by groups of 5 and church groups to participate. Clark was a moderate and we saw him as a participant in the relief of world misery. Why is it that Harper always appears to be divisive? Clark was a progressive in a number of ways. Even Mulroney in signing treaties involving land mines and so forth was progressive. But today? Canada is a new country where militarism is our new god. Gone is compassion. May Mulcair bring back values we hold dear.

  5. Great blog, Dennis. Harper keeps talking about a”balanced approach” to the problem. However his sense of balance is skewed! He is squandering billions on killing a few ISIS targets but is reluctant to spend more than a few millions on saving the lives of innocent refugees.
    Regards,
    Bob Nelson

Comments are closed.